In a large storage facility located in eastern Thailand, close to a significant highway, government inspector Thitipas Choddaechachainun carefully scrutinizes heaps of disposed electronics—circuit boards, metal scraps, and obsolete computer parts. Every week, she and her team from the Thai Ministry of Industry explore unauthorized sites managing electronic waste, gathering samples for lab analysis and regulatory compliance.
Choddaechachainun leads a dedicated task force addressing the country’s growing challenge with electronic waste, or e-waste. Despite routine inspections and raids on these unlicensed processing sites—many hidden in rural regions to avoid scrutiny—the scale of the problem continues to intensify.
Thailand is dealing with the consequences of shifts in global electronic waste allocation. Previously, countries like China handled the majority of digital discards from wealthier nations, particularly the United States and European Union members. This changed in 2018 when China implemented a ban on e-waste imports, prompting exporters to seek alternative locations in Southeast Asia, with Thailand being among the selected ones.
Thailand implemented its own ban on importing e-waste in 2020. Nonetheless, the results have not been favorable. According to Earth Thailand, a nonprofit focused on environmental protection, the amount of e-waste entering the nation has increased from approximately 3,000 tons annually before China’s restriction to almost 60,000 tons now.
The continuous movement is partly a result of the high turnover of electronic gadgets among Western consumers. Regular updates of smartphones, laptops, and other electronic items—alongside the widespread ownership of major household appliances—create a significant amount of waste. Even though there are international regulations aimed at preventing the export of hazardous waste to developing countries, legal loopholes still exist. For instance, shipments are often incorrectly labeled as used electronics meant for resale, only to be dismantled and melted down upon arrival.
The process of recycling comes with considerable environmental hazards. When e-waste reaches Thailand, it is broken down and melted to recover precious materials, including copper and gold. Although this recovery technique is lucrative, it releases hazardous materials like mercury and lead, polluting the air, soil, and water.
Thai authorities are of the opinion that most of the gathered metals are sent to China, resulting in environmental and social impacts.
Thai Industry Minister Akanat Promphan addresses the impact of these activities. He emphasizes that the illegal recycling industry does not contribute positively to the nation’s economy and instead negatively affects local habitats and communities. His ministry has launched an intensified initiative to shut down unauthorized operations and eliminate foreign-owned facilities involved in illegal actions.
Thailand is being treated as a waste deposit site, Promphan notes. “We are contending with a global waste disposal activity that offers no advantage to our nation and causes significant harm.”
The harmful effects reach ordinary people such as Seng Wongsena, a 57-year-old agricultural worker in eastern Thailand. He asserts that contaminated runoff from a nearby smelting plant has negatively impacted his cassava crop, and the odor of burning waste disturbs his rest at night. Community activists argue that the smelting operation lacks proper authorization and are urging government officials to take action.
At an international scale, the results are concerning. The United Nations reports that over 60 million tonnes of electronic waste are generated globally each year—twice the figure recorded 15 years ago. Forecasts suggest this volume could grow by over 30% by the end of the decade.
Despite the concerning rise, merely around 20% of worldwide electronic waste is processed through responsible and eco-friendly methods. The remainder is discarded in landfills or handled under hazardous conditions, frequently in nations with inadequate regulatory control.
Several nations have enacted regulations regarding extended producer responsibility. These regulations hold producers accountable for the disposal of their goods once they reach the end of their life span. Companies such as Apple, Samsung, and Dell are being urged to establish methods for reclaiming and recycling their merchandise.
Thailand is considering a similar legislative framework, aiming to strengthen local enforcement and reduce illegal activities related to e-waste handling. Promphan is optimistic about its future implementation.
“I am optimistic that we will approve this new legislation shortly—perhaps before this year concludes or at the start of the next,” he mentions. “We require all-encompassing measures to eradicate this unlawful sector and safeguard our citizens and the environment.”
As Thailand advances with legislative changes and strengthens oversight, these efforts symbolize a minor part of a broader global challenge. Handling electronic waste requires international cooperation, well-defined supply chains, and collaboration between users and manufacturers. Without significant change, the environmental repercussions of our technology-driven era could outweigh its benefits.
